Please consider registering

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

— Match —

— Forum Options —

Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Deprecated: class-oembed.php is deprecated since version 5.3.0! Use wp-includes/class-wp-oembed.php instead. in /home/customer/www/highdesertfood.org/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5051
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_Print sp_TopicIcon
GMO Industry Science Fraud and State of Science on Health Risks
MUST READ: The Institute for Responsible Technology report on health risks and many examples of outright fraud in industry "scientific" studies!
September 11, 2015
4:13 am
Near Meadview, between Lake Mead and Grand Canyon West (Skywalk)
Forum Posts: 179
Member Since:
May 6, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

An excellent description of GMO health issues and science fraud:


Summary describing some of the deplorable industry practices:


One example:

Monsanto's submission to Australian regulators on their high lysine GM corn provides several examples of optimistic assumptions used in place of science. The GM protein produced in the corn is also found in soil. The company claimed that since people consume small residues of soil on fruits and vegetables, the protein has a history of safe consumption. An independent calculation by the Centre for Integrated Research on Biosafety (INBI), however, reveals the weakness of this argument. Based on the amount of GM corn protein an average US citizen would consume (if all their corn were Monsanto's variety),"for equivalent exposure" of the protein from soil "people would have to eat between 80-800 million (males) or 60-700 million (females) kilograms of soil each day, or nearly as much as 10,000kg/second 24 hours a day seven days a week." INBI estimated that the normal exposure to the protein from soil residues was actually "about 30 billion-4 trillion times less than exposure through [high lysine] corn."[10]

In addition, certain nutritional components of this GM variety (i.e. protein content, total dietary fiber, acid detergent fiber, and neutral detergent fiber) lie far outside the normal range for corn. Instead of comparing their corn to normal controls, which would reveal this disparity, Monsanto compared it to obscure corn varieties that were also substantially outside the normal range on precisely these values.

I just don't understand how they can get away with that!

Forum Timezone: America/Phoenix

Most Users Ever Online: 97

Currently Online:
1 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Marilyn: 10

Grassroots: 3

VeganicFoodForest: 1

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 0

Members: 24

Moderators: 0

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 27

Topics: 143

Posts: 194

Newest Members:


Administrators: Christine: 179, SimplePress: 0